Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2004 10:34 pm
WOW!
Thomas
Thomas
The only thing that I would recommend is a subject change: "European Women..."
(Ooooo I just know I'll get flamed for that.)
I can't wait to see Hubird's smiley...
Page 1 of 3
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2004 10:58 pm
Great thread!
The only thing that I would recommend is a subject change: "European Women..."
(Ooooo I just know I'll get flamed for that.)
I can't wait to see Hubird's smiley...
The only thing that I would recommend is a subject change: "European Women..."
(Ooooo I just know I'll get flamed for that.)
I can't wait to see Hubird's smiley...
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2004 11:19 pm
................... 'Don't fuck with me...na-a, if you insist...'Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 3:26 am
Not sure if that's the entire story though....sometimes it's, "AAAAARRRRRGGGHHHH!!!!"petal wrote:
WOW!
Thomas
Royston
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 4:04 am
Or simply wonderful......On 2004-09-20 04:26, Counterparts wrote:Not sure if that's the entire story though....sometimes it's, "AAAAARRRRRGGGHHHH!!!!"petal wrote:
WOW!
Thomas
Royston
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 7:01 pm
well sometimes you got to take the aarrrghhhhh with the wow.
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 7:34 pm
Yes, it is the AAAARRRGGGHH to WOW ratio that matters.
R
R
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 9:25 am
If you make a graph and plot AAAAAAARRGH against WOW, you will get a perfect parabola!
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 9:34 am
Wouldn't that require negative values for either AAARRRGGGHHH or WOW? I can see negative AAARRRRGGGHHH but negative WOW?
Is WOW on the X or Y axis?
R
Is WOW on the X or Y axis?
R
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 9:40 am
Yes, WOW becomes negative when you're running out of energy!! In fact there may be apoint where WOW and AAAAARRGH are equal.
_________________
Ricardo (of the slightly bigger Clan 'Ricardo')
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Ricardo on 2004-09-22 10:42 ]</font>
_________________
Ricardo (of the slightly bigger Clan 'Ricardo')
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Ricardo on 2004-09-22 10:42 ]</font>
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2004 12:33 pm
well, as far as I can see, there are the WOW women and the not so WOW women.
Some WOW women are ARGHHHH women, and some not so ARGHHH women are not so WOW women. Given these facts, what would happen of you put together a not so ARGHHH woman and a WOW woman?
Answer: They go shopping.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: kensuguro on 2004-09-22 13:34 ]</font>
Some WOW women are ARGHHHH women, and some not so ARGHHH women are not so WOW women. Given these facts, what would happen of you put together a not so ARGHHH woman and a WOW woman?
Answer: They go shopping.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: kensuguro on 2004-09-22 13:34 ]</font>
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 8:27 am
I think we need a third axis called: "frustration", which can be both aaaaaaaaargggrggrhhhhhh and wow....
Thomas
Thomas
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 12:09 pm
Maybe you should take agggrrrr and wow as two variables that belong to a function in the complex domain.
For every value in the x and y axis, you get another in the u and v axis (the image). The u axis would be for frustration and the v axis for content. Please, note that you need to make 2 two-dimensional graphs, since it's impossible to make a four-dimensional one.
Applying the Cauchy-Reinman theorem, you calculate the second derivatives of the function against x and against y. If the function is holomorphic, the derivatives are equal, and you'll be able to find the exact
value for the balance between frustration and content. And if you plot the function, you might get a heart shaped figure, centered between the imaginary axis and the real one
Cheers.
MartÃn
For every value in the x and y axis, you get another in the u and v axis (the image). The u axis would be for frustration and the v axis for content. Please, note that you need to make 2 two-dimensional graphs, since it's impossible to make a four-dimensional one.
Applying the Cauchy-Reinman theorem, you calculate the second derivatives of the function against x and against y. If the function is holomorphic, the derivatives are equal, and you'll be able to find the exact
value for the balance between frustration and content. And if you plot the function, you might get a heart shaped figure, centered between the imaginary axis and the real one
Cheers.
MartÃn
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 3:56 pm
Yeah, the question for me is:
Can a woman be modeled as a always derivable function (in All the complex domain)? In my experience I can say it isn't impossible, but it's most unlikely...
Can a woman be modeled as a always derivable function (in All the complex domain)? In my experience I can say it isn't impossible, but it's most unlikely...
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 4:06 pm
Analog modeling?
Well, I can tell you for shure it won't be like the real thing. It probably won't sound as fat and warm - but worst of all ... It won't have the right touch.
Well, I can tell you for shure it won't be like the real thing. It probably won't sound as fat and warm - but worst of all ... It won't have the right touch.
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
Well, if it's about fatness, this would be the only case in wich I'd like to keep something in the digital domain
Martin
Martin
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2004 6:37 pm
.............. 'Funny eh?...'Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 3:15 am
Perhaps we're talking about just one axis here with WOW at one end and AAARRRRGGGHHHH! at the other, representing the polar extremes?
Eastern philosophy indicates that such extremes can become one another which may help us simple men folk to understand why a woman can be WOW! one moment and then 0.00000000000000000000000001 seconds later AAARRRRGGGHHHH!
Royston
Eastern philosophy indicates that such extremes can become one another which may help us simple men folk to understand why a woman can be WOW! one moment and then 0.00000000000000000000000001 seconds later AAARRRRGGGHHHH!
Royston
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 3:22 am
wow is right. no wonder you guys have problems with them.....(analyzing them is not the fun part...)
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 4:08 am
You've never had a problem with women / a woman?!
Er...have you met any?
Royston
Er...have you met any?
Royston