Page 1 of 1
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 8:23 am
by MikeRaphone
If I install SRB scope, and then make it the mainboard- is that same as taking I/O daughterboard off the pulsarII and putting it on SCOPE?
I don't want to break something...
Thanks

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 9:29 am
by Counterparts
Hi Mike
I don't think so. You should be able to leave the I/O on the PulsarII and make the SCOPE (SRB) board "Board #1"
The I/O will probably appear as something like:
PulsarII(2)
e.g. when I recently installed the XTC board (no I/O) alongside the existing PulsarII board (w/ i/O), the PII's I/O appeared as: 'PulsarII(2)' i.e. I think that my PulsarII is now the 'second board', but still contains the I/O for the system.
As far as I understand it, it is important for you to set the SRB as the '#1 board (as it has the most DSPs).
"Generally it is recommended that the card with the most DSPs is treated as the first, or 'main' card in a system."
Something to do with spreading those DSP-hugry mixers about...
Royston
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:33 am
by MikeRaphone
Much obliged

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 1:58 pm
by at0m
I have a similar setup, with a Scope SRB and a Pulsar2. I moved all I/O to the Scope card: simply screw the I/O daughterboard over to the other card, don't touch electrostatic sensitive parts ofcourse! The I/O then show up under 'Scope' in Hardware I/O, instead of under 'Pulsar2'. Afaik upon opening of older projects, SFP will display a warning that it cannot find the Pulsar2 I/O, just replace them with the new-called Scope I/O.
In SFP it doesn't matter which card has which keys, as long as they're all in the machine.
Oh and yes, I made the Scope #1 board.
Enjoy your new card!

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 6:02 pm
by MikeRaphone
Hmmm,
A question here Atomic- what's the practical difference between just assigning SCOPE srb as no.1 board and physically moving the I/Os?
I am still not too enthusiastic about wielding screwdrivers around my cards...
thx for good wishes, SRB is not here yet though- but soon...

Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 6:13 pm
by at0m
IMHO since most of the processing is done on the 15 dsp card, I found it logical to also give that one the I/O board, saving on STDM and other virtual wires. Also I thought the 15th dsp (which doesnt show up in dsp meter) is there to manage I/O's, so at least it has some use now.
Probably, but not scientifically prooven

Anyone else?
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 9:08 pm
by kimgr
You got all the details right at0mic, "scientifically".
Kim.
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2004 7:06 am
by EarlyFirst
The reason for the errors about the PulsarII I/O is because when you installed SFP it remembers what I/O plate was present...
just replaing them and save the def project/s and it should not happen again..
Also Atomic is almost 100% about the DSP not showing up as it is used for routing, but it's not the 15th chip like everyone seems to think

Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2004 3:36 pm
by kimgr
dsp0 ?
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2004 6:58 pm
by MikeRaphone
Ok guys, i'll let you know when i actually get the board. What are phillips screws?
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2004 9:47 pm
by darkrezin
Cross-head type screws.