Page 3 of 3
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 3:44 pm
by johnbowen
BushBasher/Shroomz,
What I meant is that I have been told it is a very complicated procedure to convert Scope-made devices to Noah (or ASB) compatible code, one that CWA feels is not possible for 3rd parties to do by themselves. Certainly I would have loved to release some plugs for Noah, were it possible.
I was told it was too difficult and too much work without much 'handholding' from CWA for them to let 3rd parties do it by themselves.
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 12:28 am
by spacef
On 2005-09-01 16:44, johnbowen wrote:
Certainly I would have loved to release some plugs for Noah, were it possible.
same here (sigh..)...
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 1:23 am
by wolf
dito ..
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 2:42 am
by astroman
it's the same machine code, but not the same environment
see it like porting an Intel app between Win98, XP and Linux - your mileage may vary significantly
cheers, Tom
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2005 5:37 am
by Shroomz~>
BushBasher/Shroomz,
What I meant is that I have been told it is a very complicated procedure to convert Scope-made devices to Noah (or ASB) compatible code, one that CWA feels is not possible for 3rd parties to do by themselves. Certainly I would have loved to release some plugs for Noah, were it possible.
John, it's a shame they were looking at it that way. Maybe these days it would be possible to convince them otherwise if it was a team effort?
It certainly seems like all three of you guys (John, Spacef, Wolf & maybe even Shayne?) would still be interested in the idea of developing for Noah were it possible. This is a great attitude which the Noah needs. If CWA could get together with the 3 or 4 of you on this one, that would be awesome.
I noticed that none of you have been too slow to make it known that you're interested. It would be great to hear what CWA think of this.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Shroomz on 2005-09-03 06:39 ]</font>