Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 10:47 am
Perhaps I was too harsh.
Scope Users Community
https://www.forums.scopeusers.com/
you're a moron.braincell wrote:Fight with your bare hands. Don't be a coward. I challenge any one of you. Don't be a little bitch boy and use a gun. Can't sleep without a gun by your bed? What a bunch of pussies!
I agree. I still do not appriciate the way you try to push your views.braincell wrote:Fight with your bare hands. Don't be a coward. I challenge any one of you. Don't be a little bitch boy and use a gun. Can't sleep without a gun by your bed? What a bunch of pussies!
Both sides are 'pushing their views'.FrancisHarmany wrote:I agree. I still do not appriciate the way you try to push your views.braincell wrote:Fight with your bare hands. Don't be a coward. I challenge any one of you. Don't be a little bitch boy and use a gun. Can't sleep without a gun by your bed? What a bunch of pussies!
huh ? how did this become about you all of a sudden ?siriusbliss wrote:Both sides are 'pushing their views'.FrancisHarmany wrote:I agree. I still do not appriciate the way you try to push your views.braincell wrote:Fight with your bare hands. Don't be a coward. I challenge any one of you. Don't be a little bitch boy and use a gun. Can't sleep without a gun by your bed? What a bunch of pussies!
You don't have to contribute to the discourse if you don't like it.
At least I'm ALSO expressing my opinions - and posting other people's opinions and statistics as well. Sorry if people can't take it.
It's an important topic, but to just relegate yourself to calling me a coward or bitch boy, or some other so-called 'hate' speech is just ridiculous.
I appreciate that you don't agree, but don't lower yourself to some 'thug' talk. It's just not constructive.
Just so you know, whether or not I own a gun (and I may not, you'll never know)- doesn't mean that I don't support those that DO express their right to own one - just like I appreciate people expressing their right to discourse.
But calling me names or pigeonholing me in some false stereotype is redundant and doesn't really contribute anything. However, if someone calls me a pussy, then they'll get a counter- response from me.
Greg
It BECAME about me when the drama was pointed my way (or our way - but whatever).FrancisHarmany wrote:huh ? how did this become about you all of a sudden ?siriusbliss wrote:Both sides are 'pushing their views'.FrancisHarmany wrote: I agree. I still do not appriciate the way you try to push your views.
You don't have to contribute to the discourse if you don't like it.
At least I'm ALSO expressing my opinions - and posting other people's opinions and statistics as well. Sorry if people can't take it.
It's an important topic, but to just relegate yourself to calling me a coward or bitch boy, or some other so-called 'hate' speech is just ridiculous.
I appreciate that you don't agree, but don't lower yourself to some 'thug' talk. It's just not constructive.
Just so you know, whether or not I own a gun (and I may not, you'll never know)- doesn't mean that I don't support those that DO express their right to own one - just like I appreciate people expressing their right to discourse.
But calling me names or pigeonholing me in some false stereotype is redundant and doesn't really contribute anything. However, if someone calls me a pussy, then they'll get a counter- response from me.
Greg
I am trying to tell braincell he is pushing his views rather poorly. I think he adds unnessecary drama to his post(s) to add "weight" to his argument.
the message I read from braincell was:
- dont be a coward
- dont fight with weapons
- dont use guns
Those are all really nice views. Then he adds drama so people start reacting to his post. Then he can counter because there are valid arguments hidden in his posts.
see.... he does have a point (sometimes). I dont want to make this about braincells... so FUCk GUNS.... but just trying to clarify since you seem to be adressing me Greg ?
There already are 'non-lethal' weapons - sound canons and microwave deterrents. And, unfortunately more and more deaths due to tazers.braincell wrote:I bet when a really good non-lethal weapon is developed, people will still demand deadly ones. They want to kill.
yeah, saw it. funny stuff.