Page 13 of 21
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2004 11:42 am
by medusa13
I think the price is 100 US dollars.
Warp69, you are pushing me to spend more money that I can . . .
But it's just too good. I can't help doing so
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: medusa13 on 2004-09-27 12:46 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: medusa13 on 2004-09-28 00:43 ]</font>
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2004 4:01 pm
by bbrian
Wow, I am continually amazed by Warp69! First we get a great deal on the best software plate verb, then a monster chorus/delay bonus, and now these double algorithm packs! All of these devices are must buys for Creamware users!
@Warp69: see if you can get CWAudio to post some CD100 pics or info along with the P100, this is a nice incentive to purchase.
Also, I have heard of a trick from several engineers. Sometimes they like to use 2 reverbs (hall or plate), panned hard left/right, with slightly different modulation settings to create a very wide reverb field. Is there some way to add an "offset" to the modulation, so that the L/R modulations are still linked, but one side has a different phase (ie sin for left, sin+180 for right) or slightly faster/slower modulation? I'm not sure if this is possible if the modulations are very randomized...or if this is possible at all with the algorithm?
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2004 5:04 pm
by hubird
it makes them both mono though
I would prefer two reverbs of different room/length etc, combined with smart delaying.
If you put an exiter followed by a stereo widthener on it during mastering you may get a more wide effect than with two mono reverbs
off topic, sorry
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: hubird on 2004-09-27 18:09 ]</font>
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2004 7:31 pm
by astroman
On 2004-09-27 17:01, bbrian wrote:
... Also, I have heard of a trick from several engineers. Sometimes they like to use 2 reverbs (hall or plate), panned hard left/right, with slightly different modulation settings to create a very wide reverb field...
I have successfully roughplated with the SPX90 and fineplated the return by the P100
You also might try some of Flexors phase tricks in front of P100 or...
hell, I love this system, and what it's developers achieve
who needs engineers tricks if one can invent a dozen per hour
cheers, Tom
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 11:06 am
by rodos1979
:blush..Warp, plz forgive my stupidness! I hadnt paid attention to the file extension so I was trying to load the .pre file! :blush
All is well now! Everything working and everything sounding excellent!
Cheers!
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 2:36 pm
by medway
On 2004-09-27 17:01, bbrian wrote:
Wow, I am continually amazed by Warp69! First we get a great deal on the best software plate verb, then a monster chorus/delay bonus, and now these double algorithm packs! All of these devices are must buys for Creamware users!
@Warp69: see if you can get CWAudio to post some CD100 pics or info along with the P100, this is a nice incentive to purchase.
Also, I have heard of a trick from several engineers. Sometimes they like to use 2 reverbs (hall or plate), panned hard left/right, with slightly different modulation settings to create a very wide reverb field. Is there some way to add an "offset" to the modulation, so that the L/R modulations are still linked, but one side has a different phase (ie sin for left, sin+180 for right) or slightly faster/slower modulation? I'm not sure if this is possible if the modulations are very randomized...or if this is possible at all with the algorithm?
Or how about just giving us a mono version that only takes half the dsp. Then you can load two different instances, with different settings.
Jesse
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 3:17 pm
by bbrian
Yes, a lite mono version would be a cool thing, the more I think about it, the less I can see my idea working! I am guessing that the modulation is handled by some sort of slow random LFO, and thus there could be no offset on the LFO cycle. Two mono verbs with different size/modulation/color would probably sound good though, but I am much more anxious about just getting the ambience/hall algorithms!
Or a suprise AMS RMX-16 emulation...
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2004 6:49 pm
by Warp69
Hey,
It would not be possible to create a lite mono version that only takes half the dsp - I could probably save 20%.
But I think I'll finish the other algorithms before any update of the plate.
Cheers
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2004 7:18 pm
by Warp69
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Warp69 on 2005-09-02 00:28 ]</font>
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2004 11:06 pm
by bbrian
Yes! I forgot about the Ursa, what a cool old piece of gear. Man count me in for a 2016 clone too. Doesn't it have some RMX 16 simulation modes in it? Those things sound really warm. I say copy their old Princeton 2016!
I can't believe they want $500 for the Ursa Major or $700 for the 2016...put them to shame for us!
You seem to be great at simulating these great devices, have you ever considered emulating a Roland Dimension D chorus? Those things are really unique and full sounding.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: bbrian on 2004-09-30 00:11 ]</font>
Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:17 pm
by sandrob
i use cw masterverb pro, also uad's and nice powercore's verbs, but this one is something different and special.
'must have' - i agree.
btw: i send request 2 days ago and i still waiting for key? i guees because of weekend?
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2004 3:54 am
by AndreD
I´m waiting too since 3 days
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:43 pm
by sandrob
still waiting...
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2004 3:46 pm
by AndreD
...and waiting..
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:38 pm
by Warp69
Hi,
Please contact craig at cc (AT) sonictimeworks (DOT) com.
Best regards
Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2004 12:01 pm
by AndreD
still waiting...
Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2004 1:07 pm
by sandrob
i send request string to cc... and still waiting...
now 'double waiting'.
Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:16 pm
by sandrob
finaly i got key from cc
thanks, warp (or kim?!?) for this nice reverb
Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 1:56 am
by bbrian
So, any news Warp69? If you already have some algos done, is it possible to do some shadey back-alley deal where I can buy them right now, or try out some pre-releases? I'm close to dropping $200 on the Princeton 2016 verb but I would much rather spend that on your devices!
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2004 9:11 am
by Warp69
Hey,
Unfortunately I dont have any news right now. The Ambience/Inverse algorithms are finished and so are the RHall/Concert Hall algorithms. I dont have any release date since Im waiting for a response from STW.
Regarding the SP2016 - I really think you should support developers with high quality products, like Princeton. They did a bold moved with the vst version.
Kind regards
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Warp69 on 2005-09-02 00:29 ]</font>