Page 2 of 4

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2003 10:04 am
by Shayne White
I just bought Solaris yesterday. I'm still waiting for a key (I think it's supposed to take a couple of days), and I'm looking forward to it! One of the main reasons I bought it was because it contains all the Pro-One stuff. :grin:

Shayne

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2003 10:27 am
by aMo
You might wanna mail John Bowen if takes too long, heh, I waited a couple of days for my Pro One recently, one mail, and 3 hours later, it was fixed :wink:

John knows support!

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: aMo on 2003-07-17 11:27 ]</font>

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2003 1:57 pm
by Shayne White
Yes, he does. I just got the key around a half-hour ago. Cool!!

Shayne

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2003 7:06 pm
by wavelength
remember to try out my latest Solaris presets, as well... just be careful with your polyphony, cuz some of these patches are pretty "stacked" and might max out your DSP-capacity:

http://www.track0.com/wavelength/design.html

cheers,

stephen

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2003 2:36 am
by medway
On 2003-07-17 11:04, Shayne White wrote:
I just bought Solaris yesterday. I'm still waiting for a key (I think it's supposed to take a couple of days), and I'm looking forward to it! One of the main reasons I bought it was because it contains all the Pro-One stuff. :grin:

Shayne
What do you mean it includes all the pro one stuff?

Also I found out that the CW version of the pro one is optimized and gives about double the polyphony, so a good reason to upgrade.

Jesse

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2003 4:02 am
by Mr Arkadin
medway wrote:
Also I found out that the CW version of the pro one is optimized and gives about double the polyphony, so a good reason to upgrade.
Not if you use it monophonically like i do :smile:

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2003 7:08 am
by medway
what about monophonic with unison? more voices to stack.

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2003 12:40 pm
by Shayne White
John Bowen's Solaris contains the Pro-One CEM oscs and filters, as well as the normal CW ones and wavetable/sampling/FM/granluar/Red Dwarf. Just about everything! Check it out at http://www.zargmusic.com

Shayne

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2003 3:01 pm
by King of Snake
On 2003-07-18 08:08, medway wrote:
what about monophonic with unison? more voices to stack.
I just tried the demo, and this new Pro One doesn't seem to have unison. What's worse, the elaborate sequencer and arpeggiator seem to have gone too. The arpeggiator is now only up or down, latch or normal. The sequencer I can't even figure out how it's supposed to work now. Where's the sequencer window? I see only "seq settings"!
I'd have thought they at least kept the old features and made them better, not remove them!
So now I would have to pay 99,- euro for an "upgrade" that removes functionality? I really don't think so.

On the bright side: the integrated fx is nice, and the knobs are smoother than the zarg version. Dunno about the sound, I didn't a/b it directly.

_________________


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: King of Snake on 2003-07-18 16:02 ]</font>

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2003 4:19 pm
by Mr Arkadin
medway wrote:
what about monophonic with unison? more voices to stack.
i use my Zarg Prophet for stacking :wink: i like to use Pro One as per the original (i do the same with MiniMax).

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:06 pm
by rrominet4
the sequencer is like a tape loop inside the pro one.

- On the main page : make sure 'record' is set to 'record', then set 'seq1' and start playing (live with key board) : you will hear it records in loop. when you finish your sequence switch to play, that's all. To delete you switch back/forth to record seq/1/off...
it stores in preset

- set tempo midi clock etc... on the additional page : I found that some settings can be set to LFO better than midi, and it syncs perfect.

It's a bit aleatory (you hear what you record late after playing) but gives nice effect due to this lack of precision... i wonder if it was like this on the original pro one.

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2003 11:54 pm
by medway
check out the manual for more info on the seq. i belive it was that way on the original. my demo seemed to expire prematuraly but ill be getting it for the polyphony alone. if i need the old seq then ill use the original. too bad if they got rid of unison mode though, sounds great on the WC version.


thanks for the heads up on solaris, might have to check that one out as well. i never realized getting a CW card would make me so addicted to trying out all these plugins.

on a side note i compared moog modular to the pro one (dont have minimax). the moog was pretty smooth but loses a lot of level when u add resonance and the resonance seems to be peaky at certain spots distorting easily which means you have to turn the level down a lot. youre osc ends up being pretty low in comparison. also there is a lot of stepping when controlling the filter via midi. i'll be interested to see how the new pro one has smoother knobs, i thought there were good already, at least from midi. the new ones look bigger so maybe they are easier with a mouse.

Jesse

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2003 4:06 am
by King of Snake
if they had kept the sequencer of the zarg version, I would have upgraded I think, if only for the polyphony and the little extra's. The sequencer is by far my favourite part of the Pro One, and it offered much more options than what's in this new version. A real shame.
I hope they update it in the future, but I'm not holding my breath. (do CW ever upgrade their plugins?)

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2003 5:27 am
by Mr Arkadin
King of Snake wrote:
I hope they update it in the future, but I'm not holding my breath. (do CW ever upgrade their plugins?)
i hear you. EDS8/16i, SB404, Poison, U Know 007, BlueSynth etc are looking/sounding a little old and lame now. C'mon CW update these to be more in line with the newer breed of devices.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Mr Arkadin on 2003-07-19 10:22 ]</font>

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2003 9:27 am
by sinix
I'll upgrade when it comes out...

I was really close to buying the standard version of the Prophet from WC, but comments from the Creamware website, "...is the first fruit of an ongoing cooperation between CreamWare and former Sequential Circuits™ developers" pretty much tell me to hold off. Isn't this pretty much saying that the other Zarg / WC products are in the works to be "improved" as well?

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2003 9:42 am
by Mr Arkadin
medway wrote:
on a side note i compared moog modular to the pro one (dont have minimax). the moog was pretty smooth but loses a lot of level when u add resonance and the resonance seems to be peaky at certain spots distorting easily which means you have to turn the level down a lot.
Apparently MMV's filter doesn't self-oscillate which seems a bit of an oversight for this 'ultimate' emulation, but worse i feel is that the VCO waveforms retrigger when you play a note. A real analogue (or good emulation) will start cycling the waveform when powered up, so that when you hit a note you may hit any point in the wavecycle, not always the beginning of a cycle.

i'd still rather use MiniMax (i'd quite like that step sequencer on SFP though).

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2003 10:38 am
by Shayne White
I thought the MMV was very nice, but if I'm going to use a modular synth I'd sooner use the more powerful ModIII, and if I want the "Moog sound", I'd sooner use MiniMax (which I unfortunately don't have yet). :smile:

Shayne

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2003 10:08 pm
by medway
hmmm..from what i remember it does self osc. but with high settings the res sounds detached from the rest of the signal. and i agree about the osc's restarting each time. i love how on the pro one they are contantly cycling.

Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2003 5:03 am
by wavelength
i love how on the pro one they are contantly cycling.
this is, of course, not limited to the Pro~One. all of my synth algorithms function this way and I'm sure John Bowen's other synth-designs are this way, as well.

cheers,

stephen

http://www.track0.com/wavelength/

Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2003 9:44 pm
by medway
seems like an obvious oversight by arturia then.