Page 2 of 2

Re: Choosing samplerates

Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:04 am
by dawman
I also still enjoy hardware effects and samplers using 8bit & 12bit from the early '80's like the Ensoniq Mirage. But even better because of it's editablity was tha Akai S612.
That was a real FuzzBox.
I sold my ancient PrimeTime and I miss it. It had the best tails for a delay, also 10/12bit.

Re: Choosing samplerates

Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:10 am
by astroman
that's why I still prefer the original A16 with it's 18/16bit converters - for sure not the most transparent thing on earth... but sounds good to my ears :D

Re: Choosing samplerates

Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:32 pm
by astroman
imho one should have at least some acoustic 'picture' in mind when adding up sources to a track.
Only high end sound generators (synths, drum samples, instrument libs) from the same origin (usually) sounds boring to my ears.
I even have reserved a stereo pair to route back from SFP to a Rocktron Intellifex (delays, reverb, chorus) because it has a different sound print than Scope FX.
When I heard the unit for the first time I immediately fell in love with that tone.
Why should I tweak if there's something that provides it right out of the box ?

One of my basses has a rather dirty tone by nature, no need for ultra-transparency on that side.
I try to balance quality with character somehow.
The bass has an excellent (clean sound) preamp btw - when I find the time, I'll risk a channel or two of the A16 by connecting the preamp out directly to the converters, avoiding the internal opamps.
It's a transformer balanced thing, so no direct harm to expected... well at least that's my guess... :D

cheers, Tom