Choosing samplerates

A place to talk about whatever Scope music/gear related stuff you want.

Moderators: valis, garyb

dawman
Posts: 14368
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: PROJECT WINDOW

Re: Choosing samplerates

Post by dawman »

I also still enjoy hardware effects and samplers using 8bit & 12bit from the early '80's like the Ensoniq Mirage. But even better because of it's editablity was tha Akai S612.
That was a real FuzzBox.
I sold my ancient PrimeTime and I miss it. It had the best tails for a delay, also 10/12bit.
User avatar
astroman
Posts: 8446
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Choosing samplerates

Post by astroman »

that's why I still prefer the original A16 with it's 18/16bit converters - for sure not the most transparent thing on earth... but sounds good to my ears :D
User avatar
astroman
Posts: 8446
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Choosing samplerates

Post by astroman »

imho one should have at least some acoustic 'picture' in mind when adding up sources to a track.
Only high end sound generators (synths, drum samples, instrument libs) from the same origin (usually) sounds boring to my ears.
I even have reserved a stereo pair to route back from SFP to a Rocktron Intellifex (delays, reverb, chorus) because it has a different sound print than Scope FX.
When I heard the unit for the first time I immediately fell in love with that tone.
Why should I tweak if there's something that provides it right out of the box ?

One of my basses has a rather dirty tone by nature, no need for ultra-transparency on that side.
I try to balance quality with character somehow.
The bass has an excellent (clean sound) preamp btw - when I find the time, I'll risk a channel or two of the A16 by connecting the preamp out directly to the converters, avoiding the internal opamps.
It's a transformer balanced thing, so no direct harm to expected... well at least that's my guess... :D

cheers, Tom
Post Reply