Re: OSX?
Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:06 am
don't get me started on flamadiddles and ratamacues... 
Page 2 of 2
Re: OSX?
Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:16 am
I wouldn't dare!
Re: OSX?
Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 6:38 am
What for? there are no decent DAWs for Linux..Gordon Gekko wrote:I wanit linux enabled
Re: OSX?
Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 10:33 am
Ardour is getting some good buzz.
However, friends that are developers tell me the developer plays a little 'too close to the chest'.
I'm wondering how well any Windows shells are working in Linux... anyways, separate topic.
Greg
However, friends that are developers tell me the developer plays a little 'too close to the chest'.
I'm wondering how well any Windows shells are working in Linux... anyways, separate topic.
Greg
Re: OSX?
Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:45 pm
...like Samplitude did 8 years agostardust wrote:Right, Ardour still lacks of midi editing (like samplitude did), but has potential.
And Rosegarden has both Midi and Audio, and is said to use vsts in Wine.
I've read of good overall results with Wine.
Don't know how good hardware interface drivers are though.
Greg
Re: OSX?
Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 11:19 am
there are other ways (like an em pee cee...) it only needs rock solid midi which i'm sure it has already. Did anyone say veethat??pollux wrote:What for? there are no decent DAWs for Linux..Gordon Gekko wrote:I wanit linux enabled