Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 4:09 pm
why? do they sound different?
I´m using the asio flt drivers now...flawlessly

tom
I´m using the asio flt drivers now...flawlessly

tom
Scope Users Community
https://www.forums.scopeusers.com/
greezASIO2 brings what Steinberg calls Direct Monitoring and Positioning Protocol to the party. Direct Monitoring delivers low-latency monitoring by sending the audio signal from the monitored input directly back to a specified output on your audio hardware. This means the signal doesn't pass through the program, so there's virtually no latency when monitoring the audio. Positioning Protocol provides sample-accurate synchronization between Cubase VST/32 and external devices. Of course, your computer's audio interface must have an ASIO2 driver in order to take advantage of these features.
oops, no VSTi etc... ?... Direct Monitoring delivers low-latency monitoring by sending the audio signal from the monitored input directly back to a specified output on your audio hardware. This means the signal doesn't pass through the program ...
ASIO2 Has the high-light features as follows:Mr Arkadin wrote:i just think the ASIO2 modules are newer than the ASIO or ASIO1, hopefully some one can explain the technical benefits as i don't know.