PlanetZ forums - scopeusers.com

On 2005-04-15 19:23, ChampionSound wrote:
I don't think Ralf has rackears,

well, obviously he should....

On 2005-04-15 19:23, ChampionSound wrote:
I don't think Ralf has rackears, just normal ones

It would be cool to have a Ralf plugin (the right one) for onboard tech support.....

Ah, the Sonic State video is up ...
http://www.sonicstate.com/news/shownews.cfm?newsid=2105#

This time Frank is Ralf-less !

still no raps

But seriously, the price is good, although I can't afford one, it surely will sell if they can get their marketing act together. I want to see this in catalogs, ads and reviews in magainzes, etc.. You have to spend money to make money. To me it would be much better and could be cheaper if it was a faceless rackmount single space item like my Nord G2. I already own a Novation 25 so why do I need the knobs? A lot of people would say the same thing. Desktop space is not available for this item and that is an issue for me. I'm not buying anymore Creamware cards or software because my system is already unstable. You might say oh it's because 2 of my 3 cards are type 1 cards. Blah! I already made a big enough investment. Outboard hardware seems the way to go for me.

It sounds like you are really just asking for a Noah. 1U or 2U can hardly make the sell/no-sell difference if you really want that sound - can it?

On 2005-04-19 15:27, braincell wrote:
But seriously, the price is good (...) Blah! I already made a big enough investment. Outboard hardware seems the way to go for me.

so buy it then half the point is that it is simple to operate. the other half is that it is hardware.

now, if u change your mind and want to go software again, well, its all good since u can use the software interface (tho i dont see why u should, and its PC only ).

what bothers me tho is the video where frank answers the question about voices. "weeeell, at least six"...

so another creamware product goes out to the shop with half finished software? smells icky...

oh, and ralph and frank and all others, give it three months, then release SOLARIS!

its gonna make a havoc.

i know u want to release proddesy first, but f**k it, go all inn when ASB max and profit has calmed down

proddesy will still be atractive to oddesy fans (as long as u fix the duophonic issue (make a knob )


and most important, dont go to the Virus kline for solaris pricing. make the price to thirds of a virus TI and ull prolly make a shitloads of money (PROMO NEEDED THOUGH!!!!).

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: piddi on 2005-04-19 21:36 ]</font>

Solaris is not a creamware instrument so don't you think it's kinda unrealitic to hope for a Solaris ASB?
The best you could hope for is John Bowen making his own hardware for Solaris.
Now some sort of Modular III ASB (a la Nord Modular) would make a lot of sense but it seems with the name "Authentic Sound Box" they have already limited themselves to only emulations of old synths. My guess is they may release a Prodyssey ASB after these two and then that's it and they'll move on.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: King of Snake on 2005-04-20 05:43 ]</font>

i would definitely buy Prodyssey if it could do both polyphonic or duo modes - might have to be separate boots on power up, but at least you could do your Jan Hammer impressions For the sort of live lead work that i would do with this polyphony would be a waste. Somehow i doubt CWA will recode a whole plug-in for duo mode though

i think Prodyssey and B-2003 will be next, although i imagine B-2003 would be quite cheap and probably quite a bit smaller as you just need a few drawbars and some rocker switches - unless they had separate drawbars for both manuals and bass pedals.

No takers on EZSynth ASB then?

Mr A

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Mr Arkadin on 2005-04-20 12:36 ]</font>

so buy it then half the point is that it is simple to operate. the other half is that it is hardware.

now, if u change your mind and want to go software again, well, its all good since u can use the software interface (tho i dont see why u should, and its PC only ).

Well, it's not that simple - the software interface is "only" for preset management if I've understood it all correctly, and not for host-integration - And then there's the isue about getting the sound into your software, if you are not mixing out of your virtual environment, with the noise that this introduces to the signal.
I wonder why they didn't include a digital output on this baby or have I misunderstood something about the USB-interface?

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: petal on 2005-04-20 13:05 ]</font>

Hi All,

Thanks for the mention of Solaris!

As many of you know, I posted a questionaire some time ago concerning users' opinions on a hardware version of Solaris. Now with the ASB hardware, it would appear that I could produce such an item...however, what I found out at Messe (and I'm very sorry to say), as with Noah, the ASB hardware does not do dynamic allocation of the DSP code, which Solaris uses quite a bit.

At some point perhaps I can produce a more limited version (which some have called "Solaris Lite") that would not use dynamic allocation. How much more limited is hard to say at this point, and of course, this also lessens the impact of such a product. As it is now, it seems the current Solaris configuration will have to remain an exclusive product for Pulsar and Scope boards.

cheers,
John Bowen

ah well, thats a shame... thought maybe they implemented this as this was one of noahs big downfalls. guess that rules out a hardware modular/flexor rack as well (atleast without some serious cicuit redesign).

not that i could afford one right now myself (hell i cant even afford the SFP solaris at this point).

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: piddi on 2005-04-20 18:51 ]</font>

as with Noah, the ASB hardware does not do dynamic allocation of the DSP code, which Solaris uses quite a bit.

Does this mean that all of our modular ASB hopes are dashed as well?

...was thinking a 1u rackmount multi-fx ASB would be cool though

...and I'm sure that the Uknow with a little tweaking and ASB status would be a lot more appealling than Rolands latest effort.

sharc,

I think it might be possible to download an 'image file' of a certain set of Modular modules...you couldn't change them in the ASB, though. It would be a fixed configuration (which is like the Nord box, isn't it?).

I don't know about the inner workings of the Modular structure, and how that gets translated to the new system, though. THere may be some other limitations. Best wait for Frank to tell us....

peace,

Yes, completely right !
My ears are completely unsuitable for rack-installation.
I saw this last year, when i was at my hairdresser.

But maybe for gound support equipment )

cheers
Ralf

On 2005-04-15 19:23, ChampionSound wrote:
I don't think Ralf has rackears, just normal ones

On 2005-04-21 16:18, johnbowen wrote:
sharc,

I think it might be possible to download an 'image file' of a certain set of Modular modules...you couldn't change them in the ASB, though. It would be a fixed configuration (which is like the Nord box, isn't it?).

I don't know about the inner workings of the Modular structure, and how that gets translated to the new system, though. THere may be some other limitations. Best wait for Frank to tell us....

peace,

If this is possible somehow, it would be a pretty damn cool compromise. Also, if actually editing a modular patch isn't possible with the ASB units, it would actually encourage people to buy Scope cards as well. I wonder why Creamware didn't get something like this together when they made the Noah

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: dArKr3zIn on 2005-05-03 20:24 ]</font>