Page 2 of 3

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 5:23 pm
by astroman
exactly... :grin:
the only slight difference is that Apple HAS the capabilities for innovation - which of course doesn't diminuish their abilities to screw customers the same way M$ does...

Someone please do me a favour and name one single product that has been developed by M$ from the ground up, only one single...

cheers, Tom

Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 5:45 pm
by hubird
numerous problem forums :grin:

Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2005 10:34 am
by kensuguro
well, the bottom line I think is, that as far as China is concerned, no body is ever going to get too much legit sales there. I mean, I'm from Taiwan and that isn't exactly the same as China, but Taiwan has Chinese culture. And it seems to me, that the pirating problem is more of a cultural nature for Chinese countries. In Taiwan, you NEVER see anyone with legit software, period. The most you can get them to buy is a book on computers, or a magazine.

It somehow doesn't work for Chinese people to buy invisible information written onto an insignificant little disk. Doesn't justify pirating everything, but it kind of mkaes sense.

Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2005 10:59 am
by Spirit
A friend of mine found the same thing right through the Middle East. He was really *trying* to buy legit software but just couldn't find anywhere that sold it !

The exceptions were Israel and also Dubai. But Dubai is mainly catering to western media and military so it's not quite the same.

Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2005 2:11 pm
by spoimala
Someone please do me a favour and name one single product that has been developed by M$ from the ground up, only one single...
I thought the original ms-dos was written by BG himself, but hell no, it's also bought-in :sad:

Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2005 3:15 pm
by braincell
Kensuguro,

Didn't I hear something about the government cracking down on pirated music in China?

Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:39 pm
by braincell
Superfluous emoticons have reached new depths. I see a trend here.

The Orangutans at the National Zoo are learning to communicate through the use of symbols:

"We are looking at the ability of apes to use abstract symbols in a concrete way,"

http://nationalzoo.si.edu/Publications/ ... onkeys.cfm

I noticed when I visited that the apes use a Macintosh. I think this says something about the type of consumer Apple targets.

Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2005 5:06 pm
by hubird
Braincell!... :grin: :grin:

Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2005 5:56 pm
by at0m
Mac is very strong graphically, and it shows :wink:

Not interested in spending my money on Microsoft at all, I'm looking forward to hear more on the Linux project. I think it leans very close to the spirit of this community, hope it gets rolling sooner or later!

How about trying out Dynebolic or Demudi for a change of all the candy graphics?

Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2005 6:47 pm
by braincell
Amen!

Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 5:25 pm
by Spirit
I've found XP to be an excellent operating system - stable & friendly & reasonably priced. Looks like I'm the only one :lol:

But this thread does confuse me. What are all the anti-Microsoft people using ? I didn't think Linux was really up to general PC & DAW use yet. Have I missed something ?

Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 7:37 pm
by hubird
they all must have a mac running under the table? come out guys...
( open goal :grin:)


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: hubird on 2005-02-01 19:38 ]</font>

Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 8:34 pm
by symbiote
SGI Indigo2 here =P

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:30 am
by Counterparts
dArKr3zIn wrote:
Why on earth can a machine not accept more than ~10-12 TCP/IP connections?
Not sure if I agree with that one...I'm coding an embedded DOS system with > 20 active TCP/IP connections, all connecting to simulators running on my dev machine. Solid as a rock (well, since altering the damned serial comms library such that it doesn't disable all interrupts which meant that the TCP/IP stack wasn't being serviced by the timer interrupt...but that's another story).

Royston

Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 9:01 am
by darkrezin
Hi Royston,

There is a limit to the number of network connections to log into a central server box, for example. I can't remember the exact amount, but I think it's between 10 and 12. We encounter this problem at work every day (we're waiting for an opportunity to set up our main in-house server with Linux).