Page 2 of 3
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2004 6:32 am
by cannonball
thanks
for this good device
and why not some presets
for startin point?
thz anyway
ale
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2004 12:08 pm
by AndreD
On 2004-02-22 06:28, MCCYRANO wrote:
uff. das ist klasse!
Oh, I didn't realize that the final will be free too!!! Wow!!!
What about putting the softclippings in inerts!? So one could decide whatever to put in the 3 inserts for each band...
Oh, what about just the frequency splitter with 3 inserts!!!! One could even put Timeworks comp X in it for compression...
Martin
that was my first thought too
but you will get phase problems...
best,
andre
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2004 10:58 am
by Immanuel
I guess, the slow way of doing so would be to align 2 high cuts and 2 lo cuts for splitting the signal, and the have the compressors after that - thus avoiding inserts. Celmo has made a cross over, that may make it a little easyer.
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2004 2:57 pm
by Submarine
Thank you Andre !
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 4:14 am
by AndreD
On 2004-02-23 10:58, Immanuel wrote:
I guess, the slow way of doing so would be to align 2 high cuts and 2 lo cuts for splitting the signal, and the have the compressors after that - thus avoiding inserts. Celmo has made a cross over, that may make it a little easyer.
...but not phasecoherent
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 1:19 pm
by Immanuel
Do you mean, that the way you split the signal does not create the phase isues of normal x-overs?
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2004 10:13 am
by Jerome
Very useful on drumbusses! Soon I'll try it instead of the optimaster or finalliza.
Jerome
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2004 3:29 pm
by rodos1979
Thank you Andre for the device!
I really like it!
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2004 5:46 pm
by AndreD
...updated -> beta 1.6
<b>new featurs:</b>
<ul>
<li>bass delay (up to 16ms)</li>
<li>more controls for softclip)</li>
</ul>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Andre Dupke on 2004-02-26 17:48 ]</font>
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2004 6:41 pm
by AndreD
new version:
beta 1.7 -> new surface-design
is the gui clear enough?
best,
andre
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Andre Dupke on 2004-02-27 18:49 ]</font>
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2004 6:59 pm
by scary808
That's an elegant GUI! Keep up the good work!
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2004 5:19 pm
by samplaire
Hi Andre,
The looks is great!
My options would be:
- bypass for each stage to have even more control of the signal
- numeric displays for all parameters
I still have problems to have a "flat" signal coming out of it, ie I can't put the knoobs/sliders to zero even when double clicked the signal isn't flat. Of course it doesn't mean I don't like the sound coming out of the device! It's really good (as somebody said great for drums
)
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2004 9:59 am
by grenzfrequenz
On 2004-02-24 13:19, Immanuel wrote:
Do you mean, that the way you split the signal does not create the phase isues of normal x-overs?
I think that the phase issues of some multiband-plugs for the creamware platform are not normal. It should be normal that the software can be used without destroying the (Master-)signal.
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:32 pm
by rodos1979
Hello!
Thanks a lot Andre for the great device! It sounds and looks great!
I ve tried an earlier version and I am now downloading your latest 1.7 version. What is the bass delay for?
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2004 12:07 pm
by MCCY
Great interface!
Much better with the clippingcontrol now. Thanks!
Any plans to build in control for the splitting-frequencies?
Martin
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2004 3:55 am
by AndreD
On 2004-03-05 12:07, MCCYRANO wrote:
Any plans to build in control for the splitting-frequencies?
Martin
no, they are fixed in this version...
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2004 3:56 am
by AndreD
On 2004-03-01 22:32, rodos1979 wrote:
Hello!
What is the bass delay for?
hi,
its just a mastering-trick to push the bass
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2004 3:59 am
by AndreD
On 2004-02-28 17:19, samplaire wrote:
Hi Andre,
The looks is great!
I still have problems to have a "flat" signal coming out of it, ie I can't put the knoobs/sliders to zero even when double clicked the signal isn't flat.
hi,
the signal is flat here, if there is no compression on it. ?!
Posted: Wed May 26, 2004 11:19 am
by samplaire
Sorry for bothering you, Andre... Still have probs with the flat signal. I tried many things and compared it with bypass and there are differences. After hitting on the faders to "zero" them (like I do on pots, faders and any controller in any device to give it the default position) it gives very silent signal, perhaps flat but not the one that I hear after hitting bypass. Can you, please send me or us a preset file containing the flat one? I'd be greatful
Posted: Wed May 26, 2004 11:26 am
by AndreD
maybe, it´s a mac-related problem?!