Page 9 of 10
Re: FleXor future
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 3:16 am
by spacef
ReD_MuZe wrote:copy protection is over-rated.
and rise the price
Re: FleXor future
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 4:42 am
by spacef
stardust wrote:especially when dongles and their royalties are involved
which is why everyone should expect soon-cubase 5 to be much cheaper than cubase 4

Re: FleXor future
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:37 am
by @plonter
Hi Happy New Year in Few Hours from Now
One more concern !!
i'm hopping to see is a big graphic, same Native Plugins and fx have small really small knob skin and overall that killing my eyes
for example "Arturia MoogModular"
http://static.kvraudio.com/i/b/moogmodularv.jpg
or "Void"
http://static.kvraudio.com/i/b/void.jpg
Asaf make it look "BIG"

Re: FleXor future
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:05 am
by FrancisHarmany
or a fully vector interface which we can zoom in/out as much as we want.
then set custom zoom/size settings per module/patch/...

Re: FleXor future
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:18 am
by sonicstrav
Void looks horrible
Moog Modular V - I have this - sound quality hmmm........
Re: FleXor future
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 2:38 pm
by ReD_MuZe
flexor is vector based you can zoom in and out no problem

Re: FleXor future
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 2:47 pm
by capacitor
Very cool!

Re: FleXor future
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 4:01 pm
by ironman
flexor will sound better than it does now. vst sound quality has nothing to do with technology and everything to do with RnD
If this is true than y is it that synth emulations like pro-53, minimoog, nord lead's discovery, junox2... all dont sound nearly as good as their hardware processors, or y isnt there any access virus emulation. i mean isnt it the dsp chips in the synth that give it its unique pure sound that u can taste ??
Re: FleXor future
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 4:55 pm
by @plonter
FrancisHarmany wrote:or a fully vector interface which we can zoom in/out as much as we want.
then set custom zoom/size settings per module/patch/...

ReD_MuZe wrote:flexor is vector based you can zoom in and out no problem

i get it Now
amazing

Re: FleXor future
Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:48 pm
by ReD_MuZe
ironman wrote:flexor will sound better than it does now. vst sound quality has nothing to do with technology and everything to do with RnD
If this is true than y is it that synth emulations like pro-53, minimoog, nord lead's discovery, junox2... all dont sound nearly as good as their hardware processors, or y isnt there any access virus emulation. i mean isnt it the dsp chips in the synth that give it its unique pure sound that u can taste ??
nop. math is math. the emulations sound bad for other reasons
any emulation is doomed to sound worse than the original. especially ones that are originated in analog circuitry.
take virus for instance, the powecore version doesn't sound as good as the hardware version, yet they both use exactly the same dsp chip. why? optimization and marketing decisions i guess.
dsp has many other benefits: its much cheaper than cpu processors, its more stable, almost no latency, and it doesn't come with some cumbersome OS attached. if one wants to make computer detached hardware - dsp is the way to go.
flexor will also be available for dsp systems.
Re: FleXor future
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 4:58 am
by @plonter
Hi
if no one post that before!
Asaf say will FleXor Native have the wires to connect between the module's, MIII Style?

Re: FleXor future
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 5:15 am
by ReD_MuZe
sure
Re: FleXor future
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 5:35 am
by @plonter
@plonter wrote:Hi
if no one post that before!
Asaf say will FleXor Native have the wires to connect between the module's, MIII Style?

ReD_MuZe wrote:sure
Aaa Yes in did a Fun Time

Re: FleXor future
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 2:46 am
by j9k
One thing no one mentioned is flexor will get a huge boost in effect and sound options just from being able to access more ram and being able to manipulate sound data in ways impossible on the scope with the sdk.
Congrats assaf
J9k
Re: FleXor future
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 3:48 am
by dawman
Ladies & Gentlemen.....................j9k. .......

........ankyu, ankyu.
Re: FleXor future
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:26 am
by ReD_MuZe
j9k wrote:One thing no one mentioned is flexor will get a huge boost in effect and sound options just from being able to access more ram and being able to manipulate sound data in ways impossible on the scope with the sdk.
Congrats assaf
J9k
true...
jude! been lookin for u!

good to see u here

Re: FleXor future
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:25 am
by Mary Mungo
j9k wrote:One thing no one mentioned is flexor will get a huge boost in effect and sound options just from being able to access more ram and being able to manipulate sound data in ways impossible on the scope with the sdk. J9k
Does this mean that Scope and its sdk are now outdated and being superceeded by cpu based systems?
Re: FleXor future
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:54 am
by Sounddesigner
I don't think we can fully assess SCOPE's RAM situation until XITE-1 is released. Unless i'm missing something.
Re: FleXor future
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:45 pm
by ReD_MuZe
is a classical guitar outdated and being superseded by electric guitar?
besides indeed xite should be able to do anything we plan for flexor modular.
you have to remember i had to use SDK for flexor, but now we are coding everything in c++ and SSE (assembly)
so flexor will be able to do much more than it could.
however this doesnt say anything about xite, the new sdk could be much more flexible, and you can always code in visualDSP (c style for analog devices) to get more out of SDK...
Re: FleXor future
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 12:07 am
by @plonter
Hello everybody
Asaf about cross platform,will Flexor Native be also for Mac(intel) or at first we will see Pc version and flow to it a Mac?
by flow i mean time based schedule to a Mac version release.
