bbe is interested.

Shayne White · Post by **Shayne White** » Wed Nov 12, 2003 12:11 pm

What -- CW doesn't make Scope D/P anymore???? Then is the platform dead as far as developers are concerned?

Hmmm....

Shayne

Post by **garyb** » Wed Nov 12, 2003 12:19 pm

afaik,dp is a limited quantity.

inDSP Frank · Post by **inDSP Frank** » Wed Nov 12, 2003 12:28 pm

We consider releasing a new DP kit not too far away in the future, stay tuned. Frank

dbmac · Post by **dbmac** » Wed Nov 12, 2003 2:36 pm

I hope the Amper guys get in on this - I'd love to see this great device updated.

/dave

Shayne White · Post by **Shayne White** » Wed Nov 12, 2003 4:50 pm

What about custom DSP atoms? Nobody who makes native devices is going to be interested if they can't port their custom algorithms over to SFP.

Regardless, this is really good news -- a new DK will spark new interest in any case. And a Noah DK would also be a good draw.

Shayne

astroman · Post by **astroman** » Wed Nov 12, 2003 7:49 pm

On 2003-11-12 16:50, Shayne White wrote:
...Nobody who makes native devices is going to be interested if they can't port their custom algorithms over to SFP...

I don't think that the majority of developes uses 'custom algorithms'.
Most is fairly common math stuff, which can probably be much better expressed in DP than in C code.

For that kind of calculations even the sequence of operators matters, even if that's mathematically irrelevant.

But to mess with the Sharcs on the assembler level is something about 1 out of 10000 programmers is capable to do, seriously.

cheers, Tom

siberiansun · Post by **siberiansun** » Wed Nov 12, 2003 7:55 pm

and hands down, i'm not one of them

Post by **garyb** » Wed Nov 12, 2003 8:59 pm

this platform is as lucky to have Tom around now as with sub then.........

thanks for the(always)info.

astroman · Post by **astroman** » Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:08 pm

well - I'm not gonna marry my girlfriend (the one in the pics thread), which is in fact my divorced wife, again - and I will stay away from cars...

cheers, Tom

aMo · Post by **aMo** » Thu Nov 13, 2003 8:42 am

Did anyone notice that CW Frank replied to this thread at all?

That means that CW now knows that BBE is interested.. So if nothing happens, that means that CW isn't interested.. I would imagine anyway..

krizrox · Post by **krizrox** » Thu Nov 13, 2003 11:32 am

On 2003-11-13 08:42, aMo wrote:
Did anyone notice that CW Frank replied to this thread at all?

That means that CW now knows that BBE is interested.. So if nothing happens, that means that CW isn't interested.. I would imagine anyway..

ehhh ... it's silly to hypothesize about such things really. The only thing we know about CW's business is what they choose to make public. We may not always understand their motives but I give them infinite credit for keeping the company afloat all these years.

I have my own theory: there's not enough business here to entice the major players. If CW was a household name like ProTools or Cakewalk, believe me, there would be a lot of majors involved.

Ya know - as I'm starting to pay more attention to the whole world of VST & Direct X now, one thing is apparent: There aren't huge gobs of choises there either! I really hadn't paid much attention to any of that before (kinda stuck in the tripleDAT bubble). Now that I'm looking around more, I'm not convinced it's more rosy on the other side of the fence. I expected to see dozens and dozens of hi-profile companies making VST/DirectX plug-ins. I can point to maybe a dozen or so. Or am I missing something? If so, please set me straight.

Post by **garyb** » Thu Nov 13, 2003 12:39 pm

the only thing stopping a bbe device as i see it,is no developer willing to make the device.cw owners who think that their cards are great just need to spread the word and the userbase will expand and others will be interested in releasing products for sfp.

emzee · Post by **emzee** » Thu Nov 13, 2003 5:44 pm

I've been told you can still download every possible VST off the net for free, or close to. Development would be unsustainable in THAT environment.

dehuszar · Post by **dehuszar** » Thu Nov 13, 2003 6:16 pm

Also, the market is unfortunately caught up in the name game, so having big-name developers on board would attract more potential customers.

Sam

mythalethe · Post by **mythalethe** » Fri Nov 14, 2003 9:35 pm

I want to echo the piece about hoping UnitX gets going again. I use the AMPER every day, and got rid of my POD. There is truly no comparison, the AMPER stomps POD in a serious way. What I really want is AMPER for NOAH! (That would give you a better POD and a MOOG in one little easily portable box!)

AMPER is awesome, please don't give up on it!

-Mythalethe

EddieK · Post by **EddieK** » Thu Jan 01, 2004 3:04 pm

It drives me nuts that Creamware does not reply to things like a DP development deal! What are they thinking?

I think they should work something out to supply DP licenses to developers free of charge in return for a percentage of the SFP plugins developed by that company....anything to encourage developers.

eliam · Post by **eliam** » Thu Jan 01, 2004 4:06 pm

I think that would be a wise move...

Immanuel · Post by **Immanuel** » Thu Jan 01, 2004 4:24 pm

And boom, we would be flooded with a plentitude of crappy plugins to sort. I bet, that would give the platform a great reputation.

eliam · Post by **eliam** » Thu Jan 01, 2004 6:44 pm

Would that be too great a price for CW's survival and expansion? Moreover, many great plugins could be created in the process...

decimator · Post by **decimator** » Thu Jan 01, 2004 7:47 pm

I agree with Eliam !
And DP for the " masses " ...
Could put a serious focus on CW, the top performers of Synthedit and Reaktor could be allured to greater challenges and sound quality !
I still stick by my mercenary approach, contact them and give them a DP for free if they are interested then they have to be addicted ...

And DP for the price of a PowerPulsar or so for the troopers.
Given the quality of CW sound, I prefer to say that some devices could be non stellar rather than crappy !