Is anyone who is capable of creating new atoms still around?
Cheers
Søren (Ravensound)
Wish for new atom (osc)
Re: Wish for new atom (osc)
in the "third parties", I think you are/could be that person, Soren 
(I'm not speaking for SC, just sat. evening thinking).
but yes, anti-aliased oscillators would be great... (we have one or two in Scope Modular)

(I'm not speaking for SC, just sat. evening thinking).
but yes, anti-aliased oscillators would be great... (we have one or two in Scope Modular)
Re: Wish for new atom (osc)
I can’t do that, but how can I help?soren_jepsen wrote: ↑Mon Nov 21, 2022 1:18 pm Is anyone who is capable of creating new atoms still around?
Cheers
Søren (Ravensound)
Re: Wish for new atom (osc)
I don't know, but I thought Soren could do "C++ to Scope" modules, so I "suppose" he can do an oscillator ? ...
Re: Wish for new atom (osc)
I was responding to Soren, but in your case I need to get busy and learn all your tools!
Re: Wish for new atom (osc)
I only remember that back in the days there was a special (very expensive) license to get access to the tools to create custom atoms. Warp69 once complained he was stuck in his development because things couldn‘t be resolved by the existing ones.
-
- Posts: 390
- Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 10:55 am
Re: Wish for new atom (osc)
What is the status of thus C++ SDK today ? Still expensive ?
\\\ *** l 0 v e | X I T E *** ///