But I don't know, I am not the one who could implement such a thing in Scope
![:-)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
If you do get time to look it to it, let me know if there is anything I can do to help. But I'm only really using Bitwig to detect the resulting response curve.To get a rough idea about response I just used a bipolar constant vs a frequency constant module and studied value readouts. I guess to get really exact values one would do the same.spacef wrote: ↑Sun Sep 12, 2021 12:21 am You never know, it might pop-up one day from me or from another but I must be honest and tell you that I won't be able to think about it for at least the next 2 or 3 months. Also, I do not have all the tools you use (for some reason, bitwig does not want to work on my pc) so this is another element that would make it difficult.
Thanks!Spielraum wrote: ↑Sun Sep 12, 2021 4:34 am nice analysis, should mean, left below, and right above? but somewhere in the middle it is correct, but with offset? that would be the starting point!
if you evaluate scope > cv and create a table with actual and target scopevalues, then i could try to calibrate the curve with scopelogic.
Ps.: today i developed a logic for the other issue that I was about to give up. now it works perfectly ...
never say never
cheers