PlanetZ forums - scopeusers.com

I'm sticking with V4.5 for now because of 2 reasons: - Because I'm working on a big V4.5 project, I'm not willing to risk the fact that the same project will cause DSP overload in V5. (reported several times) - I'm patient enough to wait for the final V5 version, wich will probably have less bugs an...

Congrats S|C! And as no one received the new keyfile yet, there's plenty of time to read the manual: C:\Program Files\SCOPE PCI\Manual\ :wink: :wink: Can't wait, go ahead Ralf :) Cheers Roman But I assume that practically everything is the same as V4.5 , functionality wise? Great upgrade though :)

Great news! I'll patiently finish my last project in V4.5, and then I'll move to V5 (proably the official, non-RC version).

Always when I see arcadios opening a topic with such a title, I know it must be a joke.

You could also try Alfonso's free XOver insert slot and insert a stock stereo expander in the lower freq slot and set the slider all the way to the left to make the lower freqs mono. You can set any crossover frequency you want between the upper and lower insert slot. Are you looking for something l...

Thanks for this tip voidar, totally makes sense.
I wonder how one can calculate the sample delay of a certain fx module. Is there a sort of sample delay calculator to apply on any device that I'm not aware of?
Thanks again!

cheers Darcy

XITE-1/4LIVE wrote: I can load 173 of them before it asks for an optimization.... ....just kiddin'.

So one instance per headphone.. that's an awful lot of headphones you've got there

Ah thanks! I missed that one...

I see that S|C updated the homepage yesterday or today. But there's still no additional info about the release of V5 for the old scope hardware users. It doesn't really bothers me right now, because I'm in the middle of a project in scope 4.5, but I'm very excited about the possible new features/bug...

Yeah, I'm curious too! I bet those new stock EQ's and compressors are still very light on DSP (For XITE it's not an issue anyway ) and better sounding than the old stock comps/EQ's....

Hi Gary, Now that I read my previous post, it does sound a bit negative (well only the word "bad"), so let me rephrase what I mean. The current stock compressors are the only ones that don't fit my needs. Personally I don't like the compression algorythm and can't get the desired result ou...

The stock compressors are cool for side-chaining application. I.e. ducking bass/guitars to kick in a clean way. Exactly. For normal compression the current stock compressors are pretty bad, but for sidechaining they are great. Very light on DSP. The only bug is that you have to use it on its own be...

Great news! I'm also very curious about V5 for my current cards comig out in a day or two. I hope there are some bugfixes too, e.g. MIDI assignments being remembered after reopening a project. Maybe there even might be an option to hide some virtual "cables" to improve the overview of the ...

A world of "SOON"?

I hope this is not the same prototype which was shown at the NAMM and Messe. Hope this is one of the first batch which will actually be sold to the public

Hmm I don't know. It could be that the availability date changes automaticly by the computer to get to the intended 29.4.2009.
And we've seen the availability date being changed several times. Personally I think this is not the moment yet.

Neutron wrote: do you mean that sound at the beginning? It is just a sample playing through molar. + ohmboys.

Sorry for not being clear in my previous post, I mean the sound starting from 1:40, where you are tweaking on a certain module. I'm just curious what it is.

Neutron wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iw18hXCLlcE

bebot

Nice setup, and cool video.
nice iPhone guitar solo, although it were random played notes
btw what module produced that FM sound with chorus?

Somewhere on youtube there is some demo of roland v-synth doing guitar with the variphrase thingy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXy3-Ni-M5Y&feature=PlayList&p=80C34E3F8B491BDC&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=53 i always wanted to get one but its about 3rd on my list after 2 ...

My thoughts exactly
SC could implement the future requests in the XITE-2 version